No I'm talking about Surgeweb not the old one. It isn't the functionality it is the overall look and feel / design of it that is not very user friendly shall we say. For me its perfect but for out customers to use they usually prefer to use yahoo or msn or something else.
As someone else said the actual back end is awesome and you guys do a fantastic job above and beyond. Its just the front end that probably needs some updating as far as the look and feel, functionality etc. Simplied Web 2.0 type of look maybe.
"Surgemail Support" <surgemailHIDDEN@firstname.lastname@example.org>To:
Tuesday, January 21, 2014 2:45:46 PMSubject:
Re: [SurgeMail List] Webmail Overhaul?
Are you referring to our old webmail or surgeweb needing improvement?
Surgeweb is our currently recommended web based email client that makes use of modern web techniques. Admittedly it's implementation now predates the widespread adoption of html5 techniques so if one were to implement it today we would probably have made some different design choices. For more info on surgeweb see:
If you are referring to old webmail, yes I agree and you should be using surgeweb instead. If you are referring to surgeweb, please be more specific in terms of what sort of improvements you would like to see ;-)
On Wednesday 22/01/2014 at 8:24 am, surgemailHIDDEN@etwinsite.com wrote:
Is there any work on making a next generation webmail? Maybe something HTML5 like Zimbra's webmail? Something that looks a little nicer on par with other systems out there right now? I just think its time for a major makeover.